You hear much talk of an ERP system helps control processes and integrate different areas of the company, but as you may know every enterprise is the best ERP for them; It may be that excellent for any company, for another it is not. Learn more on the subject from Hans Zimmer. A renowned ERP does not always mean that the leaders of project is best, sometimes when evaluate different options of ERP and have among them one great popularity; they think: If this is well-known means that it is the best and they leave aside other options; but in the course of the deployment can face the situation that this ERP was not right for them. Definitely select an ERP solution is a decision crucial in any organization, since it will depend on the efficiency that can reach the company in its operations. When evaluating an ERP system is very important to take into account the following points: 1. do participants in evaluation to people who will use the software (areas of the company that seeks to integrate with ERP, people they will administer the system, and those who approve the system). 2 Determine and delimit which are the problems that looks for the ERP to resolve (inventories, accounts payable, sales, shopping, custom reports, etc.). 3 Appoint a project leader, if the company does not have enough experience to locate and select an ERP can be supported by external consultants who specialise on the subject. 4.
Evaluate the performance of each ERP solution to be taken; knowing the trajectory of the company and specific solution, deployment times (between more deployment time, seniors will be costs). 5 Know how easy it is use of the application and that such useful is to meet the needs that you have. 6 Select the ERP solution that best suits the needs of the company. The poor choice of an ERP will represent very costly loss for the organization in terms of time and money and they will be reflected in the efficiency of their activities. You can have the misconception that a very detailed evaluation of ERP systems will be very costly and will only represent losses; when it should actually be considered as an investment. No doubt the final choice of the ERP will depend on the industry responsible for the Organization, taking into account that each industry has different requirements and different processes that control the area that you want to cover, the size of the enterprise and defined budget for ERP solution. The good choice of an ERP must not depend on the evaluation time if not in the way you make. The best ERP will be the one that best suits and cover the needs of the company Url: cimatic.com.
The second source of information, in importance, are the catalogs. With respect to technical information specialist, very few companies were found to have an organized system of consultations. 73 percent of companies do not have information centers and internal documentation, only 6 percent outside consulting services, and links with scientific laboratory are very sporadic and limited. Draws attention to the small number of companies dealing systematically searching for information about your competition, as this should be considered a vital aspect to compete under conditions of openness. The fact reminds us of the participant, to Venezuelan companies, the physical attributes of efficiency are considered the main variables for the acquisition of machinery and equipment, whereas the less important criteria are those related to human resources. While 73 percent of companies said that production capacity was the primary endpoint in the acquisition of machinery and equipment, only 22 percent said the chances of staff training as a criterion for evaluation. These results suggest that the approach to acquisition of "technology by most firms put greater emphasis on the recovery of the elements of production capacity -" tangible "- which in those elements related to the technological capabilities of human resources – "intangibles" -. However, these were the problems most often mentioned in connection with the acquisition of machinery and equipment. Own practice in relation to the problems encountered when purchasing machinery and equipment reiterates the importance of factors associated with the acquisition of technological capabilities of human resources, of course, without taking away the due importance of the physical attributes of production capacity.